Potent Quotables (updated periodically)

  • "If you like sausages and laws, you should never watch either one of them being made." -- Otto von Bismarck
  • "God who gave us life, gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever." -- Thomas Jefferson
  • "The best way to prove a stick is crooked is to lay a straight one beside it" -- FW Boreham
  • "There are two kinds of people in the world. Those who walk into a room and say, 'There you are' and those who say, 'Here I am'" -- Abigail Van Buren
  • "It was not political rhetoric, mass rallies or poses of moral indignation that gave the people a better life. It was capitalism." -- Thomas Sowell

Thursday, September 10, 2009

"You Lie"

Was Rep. Joe Wilson's "You lie!" outburst during last night's speech inappropriate? Yeah, it breaks protocol a little bit. But if he did that because he believed in what he was saying and trying to represent his constituents, then I'm not so sure he owes an apology to anyone. Perhaps he should have finished them off with, "Lying to the American people is what is really inappropriate here! Disrepectful? What about all the things Obama has said that disrespects us as Americans? What about those comments? What about the fact that he and the other libs in office are completely disregarding all of August's town hall meetings full of people who clearly don't want this government 'solution'?  What about the democrats in congress booing Bush during his '05 State of the Union?  What about the hypocrits in office right now?  If I may be so kind, you may all stick it!" Joe Wilson, for a brief moment, was a representative with some balls. Stand up and grovel no more, Joe.

On a side note, Mark Levin made two excellent points last night:
  1. It's ironic that Obama calls for "accountability" in health care while he is the most profligate spender in American history.
  2. Employment is one of the key ways people pay for health care, and this administration is experiencing (perhaps, in no short supply, contributing to) one of the biggest unemployment rates in a very long time.

Explain this to me

Regarding Grimp's earlier post on the potential "fees" (read: tax) on insurance companies as a way to "defray costs" of the public insurance plan:
I can one-up you.

How about a "fine" (read: tax), administered by the IRS, who become the defacto insurance cops, on people who don't buy health insurance. Individual mandates, this is called. Which is Washington-speak for "we're from the government and we're here to help".
A bipartisan group of senators huddled in the afternoon to decide whether to move forward on an overhaul plan that Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D., Mont.) began circulating over the weekend. The plan includes some of the stiffest penalties Congress has proposed for Americans who don’t carry health insurance coverage.
So the "public option" is out in the Senate version of the bill, but an enforced tax on families who don't purchase health insurance (which is, by nature, a completely voluntary act) is in.

So if I don't have insurance currently because I can't afford it or don't need it, you're going to fine me anywhere from $750 to $3800 if I don't go ahead and pay for something I already can't afford or don't need.

Yeah, makes sense to me.

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Public "Option"

This Wall Street Journal article mentions an important aspect of the health care bill's public option. As Senator Max Baucus knows, it has to be paid for. That means more taxes, more debt, or a roundabout screwing of someone. So what he is proposing is to charge a fee to private health insurors to "defray" the cost of expanded health coverage. What a novel idea. Make private health insurance more expensive in an effort to make health insurance more affordable. That makes perfect sense, doesn't it? It's actually pretty smart if your end goal is to drive health insurance to become increasingly more expensive and eventually force all private citizens to take the public "option". There aren't enough wealthy individuals to support a total welfare state, so it's time to tap into the corporations themselves. The problem: that strategy is unrealistic, unethical, and also hurts Americans.

Like Margaret Thatcher said, "The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."

The Importance of Being

I've written before about the importance of understanding the other side's arguments. Here is libertarian economist Tyler Cowen's attempt to describe modern conservatism. I happen to disagree with his point #4, which I think he has backwards. Strong family structures are the most important domestic issue, from which follows a strong educational underpinning. Tyler is talking about school-based education, which, to me, is only a part of a child's educational experience.
The most thought-provoking point:
10. Responsibility is a more important value than either liberty or equality.
I believe (individual) responsibility both leads to and follows from liberty. And as I have said before, conservatives believe in equality of opportunity, not equality of results. It is difficult for me to separate those three values and assign priority to one or the other, but I think he probably has the order correct.

This is a follow-up to his previous attempt to define progressivism.

See also this follow-up post:
Consider the way our views normally evolve. We sort of hunker down in our ideological bunkers trying to fend off various attacks and challenges. Sometimes an especially forceful argument will require a modification in the fortifications—and on rare occasions, we’ll even be forced to abandon a position. Which is to say, we learn from other perspectives largely in a defensive mode, through a kind of Darwinian selection of arguments. But what if instead we tried to use the insights available from our own perspectives, not to defeat or convert the other guy, but to give his argument its best form? This might sound like giving aid and comfort to the enemy, but even in terms of the Darwinian struggle, there’s value to being able to show how your view trumps even the optimal form of the competition.
Typically, when we’re not at battle stations, we recognize that the other guy’s values are genuine values; we just give priority to different ones.

Friday, September 04, 2009

iPledge

I happened to hear a guest host (Texas senator Dan Patrick) talking on Lou Dobbs' show today while I was driving back to work from lunch, and it piqued by interest.  This particular episode is well worth a listen.  There is an especially interesting call that brings up an important point...scary, and certainly not politically correct, but worth thinking about (somewhere around an hour twenty into it).

Find it here:
http://www.loudobbs.com/programhighlights?date=20090904



Honestly?  'scuse me.  Part of my lunch is coming back up...  This video contains some great messages.  It's a shame so many of them are hypocritical.  It would actually be a great video if it weren't full of political propaganda and if everyone didn't merge into Obama's face at the end like he's the source of righteousness.  Can you say, "Der Fuhrer"?  Did you know you can pledge to do great things for other people without bowing to your president like a slave?  Read the Constitution.  Does it say that you're the president's servant?  I thought I heard you say in the video that you were pledging to end slavery not become a slave yourself.

Also, on kind of a side note...you know...you might think that this health care stuff is a moral issue (some talking heads on liberal tv certainly seem to).  You'd be right in a way.  It is a moral issue to force on the responsible the ills of the irresponsible; to drag down the successful; to grab the heels of the free and weigh them down in the name of fairness.  But you'd also be ignorant because you fail to see that even more than this being a moral issue, it is an issue of what will work.  Logic.  It's a powerful tool they don't teach in Hollywood.  I'd better go say my prayers and ask for forgiveness for my blaspheming now.

PS> In the coming years, I'm looking forward to finding out how Demi freed 1,000,000 slaves.  Maybe she was refering to Ashton's spermatazoa...

I leave you with this...

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Fact of the Day

From 1901 through Wednesday, September 2, 2009 there have been 175,461 regular and post-season baseball games played in the major leagues.

Bonus facts of the day:
Here are eleven feats that have only happened once in all that time.

Barking up the Wrong Trees


Straight from the horse's mouth:
"There are those who are focused on the so-called politics of health care; who are trying to exploit differences or concerns for political gain. That's to be expected. That's Washington. But let's never forget that this isn't about politics. This is about people's lives. This is about people's businesses. This is about America's future. That's what is at stake." - B.H. Obama
Look, health care for all my friends sounds like a great idea before you've thought about any of the consequences. But we've seen how government runs things (into the ground), and we're just not so sure that we won't wind up taking it in the keester. Money doesn't grow on trees, you know. Well, unless you consider middle class Americans to be trees. I think we're thru being your birtch.

Wednesday, September 02, 2009

Caviezel: a voice of reason in Hollywood?

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/aug/09082505.html I'm not Catholic, but I do share his viewpoint of the abortion issue.

Sincerely, the USA

The following is a copy of the letter I sent to my congressman today:

Dear Congressman,

When you came to our city the other day for your town hall meeting, you said that you were here to listen. It has become apparent that you and other "national heath care" supporters have made up their minds already and are not interested in hearing what the American people actually want. You would probably consider me conservative, but I want to remind you that being a conservative neither makes me rich nor racist. Nor am I an old blue-hair. That little excuse of "racism" that people like Diane Watson(D-CA) use for discounting every conservative's opinion is ignorant at best and tells me that they are racist because they themselves refuse to use their brains in order to think past their own skin color. It's infuriatingly obtuse, and I won't put up with it.

Let me remind you that this evil thing we call capitalism has helped this nation become one of the strongest and best in the world. You say you believe in that. Prove it with your vote from now on. Our standard of living is high in the US, and it's not because of government. Look at Wal-Mart which is always lowering prices and offering increasingly better products. It has increased the standard of living for people both rich and poor because it has to compete with other businesses like Costco and Target. It doesn't offer lower prices out of the goodness of its heart. It does it because it has to compete. We know this works, and yet, I hear nothing in this health care "debate" about increasing competition in order to lower health care costs. All you are talking about is increasing the coverage by distributing wealth.

Rather than causing all ships to rise, you will cause them to sink because they are all tied to the same government anchor. What motivates your need control all aspects of American life? Why do government fingers have to be in every piece of American pie? Almost everyone has some sort of sad story. No one's life is perfect. But you cannot give everyone food, water, shelter, health, peace, and prosperity. You can try, but you'll find in the end that you've worsened the standard of living for all because you've redistributed profits and the incentive to outdo the competition. And then we'll spend the next 100 years recovering from your "help". It is our job, the people's job, to help each other without your controlling us.

If government tries to step in everywhere to help, the people of this nation will become helpless and worthless. Think how far we've come already. If you don't want to, you don't even have to be responsible for getting yourself pregnant anymore in this country! It's legal to literally suck a baby out of a woman's insides, tear it to pieces, and chunk it in the trash. Making that legal is one of government's many contributions. Is that the kind of legacy you want to leave? Is that how you want to be remembered by history, by people, by God?

Examples of higher cost, slower performance, and decreased quality abound when government takes something over which is meant to be controlled by the people (ie free markets). Think about minimum wage. It is a racist law. It has helped keep a lot of minorities unemployed. A business owner might want to hire a minority to do a job but cannot because minimum wage is too high to make him/her affordable. Therefore, the business owner decides he/she cannot hire that person at all. Consequently unemployment. Now that person, instead of starting at the bottom and working up, stays at the bottom and goes nowhere. Why is that a hard concept for you in congress? I think it's because you like to promise people more money to get votes and not have to deliver on that promise. You fool people into voting for you. At least for a while. I assure you that we are catching on.

Your government career will not last unless you remember who you work for and represent. Please remind our President of the same. He and his wife think that we are all uninformed and unengaged. We hired you both to represent us, not yourselves. Now do it. Be what you are meant to be, and we, the people, will appreciate you for it. Or you can spend your life trying to impress our moronic media and congress' liberally minded wannabe dictators.

Tuesday, September 01, 2009